Skip to main content

Manuscript Issue

It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed:

The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions.

The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitization flatten literary objects, largely catering to the idea that the "text" is a series of words in the order intended by their author. What this view neglects, however, are all the other aspects of texts: the spatial layout of the words on the page, the shape of the handcrafted letters, the extraneous marks, the scribbled illustrations, etc. More than anything, the translation of handwritten texts into print and digital formats erases all trace of the composition process: eraser marks, scratched out segments of text, re-arranged words and phrases. What I'm hoping is that this issue will foray into this older form of composition - a form that for most writers is still the initial mode of composition. Personally, I still scribble out poems and raps in notebooks and scrap paper before transcribing them onto the computer. There's something raw and personal about this original form, and hopefully this issue will preserve, display, and celebrate that.

Further inspiration comes by way of William Blake's famous illustrated poems (http://www.artscapes.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/4/Tyger.jpg), Emily Dickinson's notoriously messy sonnets (http://shrvl.com/Gk176), and the striking images of T.S. Eliot's "The Waste Land" slashed and burned by the ruthless edits of Ezra Pound (http://people.virginia.edu/~sfr/enam312/tsewlms2.jpg).

Questions, comments, suggestions? Feel free to comment, visit the website at www.thewritersblockmagazine.ca or contact me at the.writers.block@hotmail.com.

Comments

  1. i am very interested in this call for submissions -- i find it intriguing. will submit some work for sure. also blogged about this and the larger idea of the iterations of a MS/poem here: http://plumbblogdotnet.wordpress.com/2011/06/16/iterations/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the interest and the for the well-written meditation on the role of hand-writing in the composition process! "One Art" is one of my favourite (and admired) poems. Whereabouts did you find the draft with her scribbles on it? That poem in particular would be really neat to see in its original form, given Bishop's struggle to (write it!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are welcome! The early draft of Bishop's "One Art" can be found in Janet Burroway's text, Imaginative Writing: The Elements of Craft, Third Edition, pg 212.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Guidelines

In an attempt to begin articulating what effective writing looks like at the present moment, Teilo and I have formulated three basic guidelines. They're meant to start a conversation more than anything, and are not meant to be overly prescriptive. However, we feel that following them as closely as possible will eliminate many of the weaknesses we have observed in the writing submitted to our respective literary magazines. In no particular order, they are: - Subjectivity, as far as it illuminates common experience, can be more effective than objectivity. - Intertextuality can be an addition, but never the crux. - The form of a work of art should never become its content. Please feel free to comment. Both affirmation and disagreement are necessary cogs in the engine of any progression.

Beyond Immediacy

The closing sentence of your last post, Teilo, suggests that art doesn’t have to be as careful nowadays as it has been in times past. Is sloppy art the answer to sloppy communication? Is a plurality of art forms the answer to a plurality of communication modes? This type of art exists – in the form of fictional msn conversations, blog novels, etc. – and I think there is value to it, but I don’t understand why the thoughts of the modernists (or whoever) are “worse than meaningless.” I don’t think we’re really “reacting to” the modernists anymore either—although it’s impossible to quantify what “reacting to” even means—but we’re definitely influenced by them. What I had in mind by pointing back to Imagism was to glean some of that movement’s aesthetic principles, in addition to adding principles of our own. In this way perhaps the strongest aspects of that movement can be adapted to fit our needs of expression in the 21 st Century. And the general thrust of my argument is not fixated o