Skip to main content

Writing About Writer's Block

As the Editor of a literary magazine called The Writers Block, I guess I shouldn't be surprised at the amount of submissions I receive about the phenomenon of writer's block. But I am. With one or two exceptions, these pieces (usually poems) go like this: 1) The writer is confronted with a blank page, 2) This terrifies and frustrates them, 3) They lament and grapple with words, struggling through the darkness until, lo and behold, 4) The blank page is no longer blank and they've produced a poem after all. Up until this point I am 100% supportive of such processes. All writers go through this on a regular basis, and the best way to get through it is to just write, no matter what you write about. Usually when you're stuck you end up writing about how you're stuck. I get it.

What I'm not supportive of is 5) Gushing with relief at their new-found liberation, the writer slaps a writer's block-related title on their new poem and sends it to a literary magazine ("Hey, what about The Writers Block?") to get published. When I receive poems about how difficult it is being a writer, I can't help but remember a line from this one Immortal Technique song: "You coffee-shop revolutionary son of a bitch." That's a little extreme, of course, but what I mean by that is that being a writer is a privilege. There are all kinds of writers and ways of writing in North America alone, but I think its safe to assume that the vast majority of those of us who submit and subscribe to literary magazines are likely typing on laptops, maybe sipping mochachinos, attending or teaching classes at some sort of post-secondary education. This is a generalization, but, I would argue, a valuable one. What I want to get across on my first entry in this blog is that those of us who fall under one or more of these generalizations need to take a step back every now and then and put things in perspective: if you're submitting to a literary magazine, you're probably in pretty good shape. Therefore offering up a poem for others to read about how hard it is to be a writer probably isn't all that important.

For me at least those sorts of poems are not only boring, but narcissistic as well. When we submit a poem somewhere for publication, we are implying that the words we speak in it are important and should be heard by other people. What both The Writers Block and The Oral Tradition attempt to promote is writing that above all else leaves an immediate impact on the reader. Writing about how hard it is to write rarely (if ever) needs to be heard by other people. Especially when such writing is distracting people's attention away from narratives like Richard Stevenson's "Rock, Scissors, Paper" in the newest issue of TOT, which at one point takes the perspective of a child rapist/murderer in order to show how depraved our society and media are in terms of what we want to see on TV. Now THAT is writing that matters.

(For the record, TWB has only ever published one poem about writer's block. It's the last poem in the fourth issue, by Peycho Kanev and I stand by its publication to this day. This is it: "The tongue of my soul / is hanging out")

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Manuscript Issue

It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati...

Why Write?

Most writers, when asked, will tell you that they write because they can't stop, can't help themselves. This is a great answer, except that they seem to have misunderstood what was being asked of them. The question isn't “Why do you write?” but rather, “Why should you write?” It's a very convenient, romantic notion of the suffering writer, who writes because he cannot stop, despite being ignored by all (I can't help but think of Dylan Thomas' “In My Craft or Sullen Art”). Unfortunately, this is useless, and largely untrue. No longer do writers have patrons, like Yeats, nor can any but the most successful make a living off their art (and do not choose their art over their worldly existence). Nearly every writer you read nowadays holds a job separate from their art, and although it may not sing to their souls in the same fashion, it is the lifeblood that shapes their experiences and, in turn, their art. Yet again literature is struggling to reinvent itself. This i...

"Why Should We Write?"

There's an interesting phenomenom I've noticed with the release of the first issue of The Oral Tradition: people go to the magazine's submission's page nearly as often as they look at the issue itself. This could mean any number of things, but I think it says something about writers nowadays. We seem to be more concerned with finding a place for our own voice to be heard than listening to other voices . . . and then we complain that no one is listening. This leads to the market being supersaturated, and brings me to a question I think will soon become essential to contemporary literature. A certain question can come to define a certain age. Post-modernists asked "What should a poem be?" and modernists asked "Why should we continue to write the same way?" Before this, the typical question being answered in literature was "How should we live?" or "What is the good life?" I believe ours is "Why should we write?" More people...