Skip to main content

Writing for the Facebook Generation

By
What has consistently bothered me about the founding tenet of The Writers Block—immediate impact above all else—is that it is a response (perhaps a concession) to an apathy, a lack of urgency in the public at large towards the literary arts. This consideration of one’s audience and social context is a precarious line to walk: on one side of the tightrope looms dumbed-down simplicity, and on the other lies complexity, intertextuality, and dismissal on the part of the average reader. This opposition, of course, is deliberately polarized, but it gets at the crux of the issue: at what point does good, innovative writing suffer under the restriction of having to make an immediate impact on an audience permeated by facebook, twitter, and smart phones?

Everyone will have their own answer to this question. Perhaps a more solvable and provocative question is this: how can writers nowadays create works that are new and unique, but also accessible? The writing I receive at The Writers Block—while often very compelling—seems lost. Aside from the inevitable narcissism and mimicry, the pieces of writing I subjectively deem “good” are quite disparate, both in content and in form. While this has been working just fine for the last three or so years, I can’t help but long for a more coherent aesthetic philosophy for the magazine than simply searching for work that produces an “immediate impact.”

Part of me is convinced I’m just naïve and ignorant to what is happening around me in the world of writing, that there are movements of writers and schools of thought, etc. that are pushing writing in this and that direction. Surely they exist. Yet, if I am unaware of such movements, I would guess that it is likely that many of the contributors to the Block and similar magazines are in the same boat, and that whatever these movements are doing, they're not having much of an impact on the average writer. What shape does writing need to take at this current historical moment to be socially and/or artistically effective?

For me, certain aspects of Imagism are attractive in this direction: sparse, well-crafted work that is built on pregnant images and uses less to convey more. As always, Ezra Pound's "In a Station of the Metro" is the ideal embodiment of these ideas (http://www.bartleby.com/104/106.html). I think it’s safe to say that at the present moment long-windedness has no place whatsoever. No one has the patience to read an issue of an online literary magazine composed primarily of four or five 6000 word “short” stories. Connected with the sparse beauty of Imagism, I would emphasize a continued focus on character development as well. If long-windedness has no place, neither does pure abstraction. When the succinctness of Imagism is grounded in the familiarity of human beings, the result is often an intriguing combination of complexity and immediacy. Ever since Issue 4 of the Block, which had as its theme, “People,” I have noticed myself gravitating more and more in my editorial decisions to work grounded in some way in the thorough exploration of the human psyche.

While these suggestions are not revolutionary, they begin to propose a direction for writing today that hopefully will become clearer and clearer as the apathy of the current generation continues to grow. These two trends cannot help but affect one another.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manuscript Issue

By
It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati...
4 comments
Read more

Why Write?

By
Most writers, when asked, will tell you that they write because they can't stop, can't help themselves. This is a great answer, except that they seem to have misunderstood what was being asked of them. The question isn't “Why do you write?” but rather, “Why should you write?” It's a very convenient, romantic notion of the suffering writer, who writes because he cannot stop, despite being ignored by all (I can't help but think of Dylan Thomas' “In My Craft or Sullen Art”). Unfortunately, this is useless, and largely untrue. No longer do writers have patrons, like Yeats, nor can any but the most successful make a living off their art (and do not choose their art over their worldly existence). Nearly every writer you read nowadays holds a job separate from their art, and although it may not sing to their souls in the same fashion, it is the lifeblood that shapes their experiences and, in turn, their art. Yet again literature is struggling to reinvent itself. This i...
Post a Comment
Read more

"Why Should We Write?"

By
There's an interesting phenomenom I've noticed with the release of the first issue of The Oral Tradition: people go to the magazine's submission's page nearly as often as they look at the issue itself. This could mean any number of things, but I think it says something about writers nowadays. We seem to be more concerned with finding a place for our own voice to be heard than listening to other voices . . . and then we complain that no one is listening. This leads to the market being supersaturated, and brings me to a question I think will soon become essential to contemporary literature. A certain question can come to define a certain age. Post-modernists asked "What should a poem be?" and modernists asked "Why should we continue to write the same way?" Before this, the typical question being answered in literature was "How should we live?" or "What is the good life?" I believe ours is "Why should we write?" More people...
Post a Comment
Read more