Boys are struggling more than girls in Canada’s current
Education system. A plethora of rambling articles and video blogs are popping
up to expose the problem and propose solutions. As usual when it comes to
delicate social issues, I’ve found some helpful and some not. Many are
offensive, qualifying their overarching essentialist gender claims with statements
reminiscent of the tried-and-true schoolyard immunity idol, “No offense, but…”
In many other countries around the world, the standard list of ultra-respected/wealthy/enviable jobs includes teachers alongside lawyers, doctors, engineers, etc. In Canada, teaching is often considered a cop-out for people who graduate from University with an Arts degree and suddenly realize that the only value to everything they’ve just been taught for four years lies in passing it on to teenagers. I lost track a long time ago of how many people, after hearing my major, stated (not asked): “So you’re going to teach.”
The majority of commentaries on this topic blame our “feminized”
Education system. Some even expose a cloak-and-dagger “War on Boys.” To me, that
sounds a lot like all those white men out there who are convinced that they
(we) are a threatened minority with less and less voice, power, money, and
political clout. I hear most of this is as just whiny noise from the system’s rusty
gears, which are finally—finally—starting
to move the needle on the equality meter somewhere other than the 100% male
dominated everything that it’s been stuck on since at least the Old Testament.
No offense, but here are my two cents: there’s a causal link
between the status of Education in our country and the struggles that boys are
having within that system. Patriarchy teaches men they are entitled to respect,
and since teachers are not respected, most men don’t want to become teachers.
As a result, there are fewer and fewer male role models in the schools and an
increasing percentage of boys are struggling and acting out.
In many other countries around the world, the standard list of ultra-respected/wealthy/enviable jobs includes teachers alongside lawyers, doctors, engineers, etc. In Canada, teaching is often considered a cop-out for people who graduate from University with an Arts degree and suddenly realize that the only value to everything they’ve just been taught for four years lies in passing it on to teenagers. I lost track a long time ago of how many people, after hearing my major, stated (not asked): “So you’re going to teach.”
In my last semester as a Teaching Assistant up at SFU I got
to know an aspiring teacher from Sweden who was appalled at how poorly we treat
our teachers in this country. Back home, he said, teaching is one of the most
respected professions, bar none. The way one established teacher put it to me recently
was, “everybody loves their kid’s teacher, but most dislike and won’t support teachers
in general, especially when it comes to labour disputes.” This lack of status
is reflected in Canadian teachers being chronically underpaid and increasingly
stripped of their basic rights in the workplace.
So what is the “feminization” of the education anyway? Most
people who make this claim point to how women easily outnumber their male
counterparts in the school system. Basically there are way more female teachers
out there. From here, though, things get fuzzy, really quickly. Common “Step 2”s
to this argument include: women are biased towards girls, men are also biased
towards girls, girls are easier to teach, girls don’t need a reason to learn
whereas boys do, boys have more energy, boys need less structure, and there
aren’t enough male role models, both in the media and the classrooms.
Some of these reasons have more merit than others, but I’m
most interested here in this last point about role models. My own experience
growing up in the Education system as a boy taught me that it wasn’t “cool” for
boys to be smart. Out of thirty kids in my grade school class, six were girls.
These six girls had the highest grades in the class, all the way from Kindergarten
to Grade 8. Part of that was just that they were all very intelligent,
motivated people, whereas most of the boys were bent on being farmers like
their fathers and so had little interest in performing well academically. Another
part of it, however, was that there was an unwritten social code - upheld in various ways by the teaching staff - that in order to be
accepted, us boys had to underperform as a pack. I’m convinced that I
restricted my intellectual development for years, trying to fit in with my male
peers. I actually had quite a few male teachers (it was a private, super-patriarchal,
Christian school, after all), but I don’t remember any of them ever directly
addressing the stereotype that boys are less intelligent than girls. The behavioral
mold we all just kind of fell into was that for girls to find us attractive and
our fellow boys to accept us as cool, we had to make jokes, slack off, and act
as though we didn’t care about anything to do with school besides Gym class and
playing sports at recess.
This is just one story among millions, of course. But I can’t
help but wonder: what if a dynamic male teacher, leading by example, had
managed to convince us that it was cool
to be passionate, intelligent, and motivated? How might that have affected our
journey as students and our development as men, as people? What if there were
teachers of both genders convincing us of this all the way through the
educational system? Perhaps instead of proposing wild essentialist theories
about how boys and girls learn in different ways, we could just acknowledge
that everybody learns in different
ways and instead turn the lens back on the social power structures that everything
boils down to anyway.
*I* was a smart girl, and I thought those farmer boys who acted like dolts were pathetic. Definitely not attractive, nor cool. What I would have appreciated was a smart guy who could talk intelligently, was widely read, and wasn't completely sexed out of his mind. I grew up in a similar community--farmers--and figured out in Grade 8 that I had to work hard so I could leave as soon as I graduated, and never go back.
ReplyDeleteSmart girls appreciate smart boys. Why dumb down the genes with dumb genes?
Yeah, there's pressure on guys to squash their intelligence, but it's on girls too, don't kid yourself. Particularly in rural schools. Because generally, guys have been scared of smart girls, so it's hard to get a date. And there's not much to choose from, because, well, there just aren't that many people. Makes you wonder what people did in olden times when there were only widely scattered villages.....