Skip to main content

An 18th C. Style Plea For The Restoration Of The Art Of Listening

Image
By
A quick word of warning: this is a work of entertainment, filled with hyperbole, and is not intended to be taken in complete seriousness. With that in mind, enjoy!

Tempus tacendi, et tempus loquendi.

It has long been an Observation of mine that our World is little occupied with the Practice of Listening, and upon much Reflection, I have decided that there is a Moral Obligation for myself to expound on this most pressing Problem. In each Place, each Mode of Discourse, each Matter of Importance, I cannot help but be made aware of the Clamour created by a Miriad of Voices, each Shouting in a vain attempt to be heard above the Din of Others; not One realizing that their own Voice is simply Another Part of the Cacophony. Sirs, we seem to have lost the Art of Listening, and whereupon, our Manners and all things which proscribe to our very Humanity. As each Voice, each Opinion, each Insight piles ever higher upon the very Heap of Garbage that is swiftly accumulating within the Great Sphere of Literature, its Wretched Reak begins to overpower and obscure the Heart and Centre of this Great Tradition which has so unfortunately inspired the Multitude of Individual Response. With all my Heart, I urge and implore Each and Every One of Us to Refrain from all but the most Pure and Innocently Inspired Impulse to discover whether our own Humble Scribblings belong alongside those of our Betters. After all, it is only as a Society which can run as a well-oiled Machine, each Citizen accepting his Role and the Machine accepting each Citizen, that we can ever realize our Pretensions of being worthy of the Name: Human.

Comments

  1. UnknownNovember 24, 2010 at 12:12 AM

    My sense is that this piece should be read in the context of the phenomena you examined in your post entitled "Why do we write?" where more visitors to TOT's site go to the submission guidelines page than to the current issue page.

    To translate (and degrade a little) your eloquence, then, in the hope of perfect clarity: writers need to start reading; we need to stop just "yelling" our words indiscriminately and trying to reel in publication after publication. Street cred only gets you so far. My advice, to build on the general thrust of this timely plea, is to return to a time when literary style and attention were privileged over the capitalist mindset of "MORE MORE MORE"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Guidelines

By
In an attempt to begin articulating what effective writing looks like at the present moment, Teilo and I have formulated three basic guidelines. They're meant to start a conversation more than anything, and are not meant to be overly prescriptive. However, we feel that following them as closely as possible will eliminate many of the weaknesses we have observed in the writing submitted to our respective literary magazines. In no particular order, they are: - Subjectivity, as far as it illuminates common experience, can be more effective than objectivity. - Intertextuality can be an addition, but never the crux. - The form of a work of art should never become its content. Please feel free to comment. Both affirmation and disagreement are necessary cogs in the engine of any progression.
13 comments
Read more

Beyond Immediacy

By
The closing sentence of your last post, Teilo, suggests that art doesn’t have to be as careful nowadays as it has been in times past. Is sloppy art the answer to sloppy communication? Is a plurality of art forms the answer to a plurality of communication modes? This type of art exists – in the form of fictional msn conversations, blog novels, etc. – and I think there is value to it, but I don’t understand why the thoughts of the modernists (or whoever) are “worse than meaningless.” I don’t think we’re really “reacting to” the modernists anymore either—although it’s impossible to quantify what “reacting to” even means—but we’re definitely influenced by them. What I had in mind by pointing back to Imagism was to glean some of that movement’s aesthetic principles, in addition to adding principles of our own. In this way perhaps the strongest aspects of that movement can be adapted to fit our needs of expression in the 21 st Century. And the general thrust of my argument is not fixated o
5 comments
Read more

Manuscript Issue

By
It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati
3 comments
Read more