Skip to main content

Aesthetic Apathy

By
I’d like to push this idea that today’s writing has no coherent aesthetic direction. Central to this lack is a complex net of social, political, and technological developments. For me, the “Facebook Generation” I referenced in the title of my last post already carries a note of exhaustion and cliché. What exactly does it mean to be living in such a generation? Beyond the useless moralistic debates that swirl around social networking sites, I prefer to analyze them as embodiments of social trends, and not as social trends in and of themselves. An integral aspect of the social realities advanced through the explosion of Web 2.0 onto the scene is that people have become more distanced from reality.

We North Americans live in fevered times, but in many ways these times always seem to happen elsewhere—on the internet, on our computer screens, across the ocean…wherever. War today is a foreign concept for the majority of North Americans under a certain age. We’ve heard stories of the World Wars, Vietnam, Korea, etc. and against the backdrop of these horrors, the ongoing wars in the Middle East just don’t carry the same “we-need-to-keep-our-lights-off-at-night-because-the-Germans-are-coming-to-bomb-us” kind of terror. So, we’ve got problems—massive environmental disasters, fuel and water shortages, economic recessions—but these problems are so abstract and complex that it’s difficult to know how and why doing art is a valuable and necessary activity anymore.

Political apathy is a major part of this aesthetic apathy. Writing is expression; it depicts, slants, and unveils reality from multiple perspectives. Yet instead of exploring and expressing the many issues the world is faced with, more and more of us choose to simply ignore these issues in favour of activities that give us easy and immediate gratification (like clubbing and video games). In order for writing to have a coherent aesthetic direction, it has to recognize and respond to the social, political, and technological realities of the present moment.

George Orwell begins Why I Write by stating, “As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me” (11). WWII lent Orwell’s writing a tone of pronounced urgency that resulted in classics like Animal Farm and 1984. The Facebook Generation has not yet realized the shape of its urgency, and thus it lacks aesthetic direction in both content and in form.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Guidelines

By
In an attempt to begin articulating what effective writing looks like at the present moment, Teilo and I have formulated three basic guidelines. They're meant to start a conversation more than anything, and are not meant to be overly prescriptive. However, we feel that following them as closely as possible will eliminate many of the weaknesses we have observed in the writing submitted to our respective literary magazines. In no particular order, they are: - Subjectivity, as far as it illuminates common experience, can be more effective than objectivity. - Intertextuality can be an addition, but never the crux. - The form of a work of art should never become its content. Please feel free to comment. Both affirmation and disagreement are necessary cogs in the engine of any progression.
13 comments
Read more

Beyond Immediacy

By
The closing sentence of your last post, Teilo, suggests that art doesn’t have to be as careful nowadays as it has been in times past. Is sloppy art the answer to sloppy communication? Is a plurality of art forms the answer to a plurality of communication modes? This type of art exists – in the form of fictional msn conversations, blog novels, etc. – and I think there is value to it, but I don’t understand why the thoughts of the modernists (or whoever) are “worse than meaningless.” I don’t think we’re really “reacting to” the modernists anymore either—although it’s impossible to quantify what “reacting to” even means—but we’re definitely influenced by them. What I had in mind by pointing back to Imagism was to glean some of that movement’s aesthetic principles, in addition to adding principles of our own. In this way perhaps the strongest aspects of that movement can be adapted to fit our needs of expression in the 21 st Century. And the general thrust of my argument is not fixated o
5 comments
Read more

Manuscript Issue

By
It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati
3 comments
Read more