Skip to main content

A Look Backwards

I've always felt that the best piece of advice that is always given to writers is to read as much as you possibly can, in as great a breadth as you possibly can. The more exposure you get to differing styles and voices, nevermind the appreciation and knowledge of history that comes with it, provides endless inspiration and direction for your own work. The modernists and post-modernists are innovative beyond belief. Read e.e. cummings and compare him to the poets who came before and afterwards. It's quite possible that he's been a more influential figure for poetry than Shakespeare. Before that, Byron and Tennyson show what can be accomplished through formal poetry, and if you're looking for satire, Swift is the master (and has been for centuries). And as much as cummings may have changed the poetic landscape entirely, it's impossible to overstate the impact the Renaissance had upon literature.

What fascinates me, as I look backwards for my own inspiration, is how the two most significant changes in literature (the Renaissance and modernism, in my opinion) came about from a rediscovery of the importance of the writing of earlier times. For the Renaissance, this meant rediscovering Plato and Aristotle, as well as Homer, Virgil, Ovid, etc. Suddenly the themes were no longer solely Christian; there were a multitude of sources upon which to draw for inspiration. Modernism also looked back to the Greeks and Romans, but through Ezra Pound in particular, medieval Chinese poetry and the French troubadours opened new avenues of expression (the medieval Chinese poetry helping to form his ideas around Imagism for example).

What else will come from the past to change literature today? Will the Americas' myths inform our writing more fully? With the explosion of fantasy, will medieval epics be rewritten in modern styles? What's next?

Comments

  1. Connected to this is the problem of the new. As in, how do we are writers in 2010 produce something "new"? e.e.cummings is an interesting example, even just in terms of his formal move to lower-case expression. This has been copied endlessly, and often contributes nothing new or meaningful to the copyists' work; it just looks cool. In terms of what's next, I'm pretty sure no one's going to read that questions and say, "Hey! I know what's next! Its _______!" I think all we can do is ask questions like we have been on this blog that get at the impetus of writing. I think the question of what's next for us writing in the present moment ties in very closely with how literature and writing are being positioned/minimized/degraded/disseminated in the world's various cultures more generally. Because "artsy" writing seems so liminal in a lot of ways to the consciousness of everyday people, I think one solution is to do what The Writers Block and Oral Tradition strive for: to only publish writing that makes an impact on the reader, whatever this impact ends up looking like. For me, that's what's next. But I don't think this writing will end up unifying itself as neatly as writing in the Renaissance or Imagism, for example. I think its power lies in its diversity and ecclecticism.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manuscript Issue

It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati...

Why Write?

Most writers, when asked, will tell you that they write because they can't stop, can't help themselves. This is a great answer, except that they seem to have misunderstood what was being asked of them. The question isn't “Why do you write?” but rather, “Why should you write?” It's a very convenient, romantic notion of the suffering writer, who writes because he cannot stop, despite being ignored by all (I can't help but think of Dylan Thomas' “In My Craft or Sullen Art”). Unfortunately, this is useless, and largely untrue. No longer do writers have patrons, like Yeats, nor can any but the most successful make a living off their art (and do not choose their art over their worldly existence). Nearly every writer you read nowadays holds a job separate from their art, and although it may not sing to their souls in the same fashion, it is the lifeblood that shapes their experiences and, in turn, their art. Yet again literature is struggling to reinvent itself. This i...

"Why Should We Write?"

There's an interesting phenomenom I've noticed with the release of the first issue of The Oral Tradition: people go to the magazine's submission's page nearly as often as they look at the issue itself. This could mean any number of things, but I think it says something about writers nowadays. We seem to be more concerned with finding a place for our own voice to be heard than listening to other voices . . . and then we complain that no one is listening. This leads to the market being supersaturated, and brings me to a question I think will soon become essential to contemporary literature. A certain question can come to define a certain age. Post-modernists asked "What should a poem be?" and modernists asked "Why should we continue to write the same way?" Before this, the typical question being answered in literature was "How should we live?" or "What is the good life?" I believe ours is "Why should we write?" More people...