Skip to main content

An 18th C. Style Plea For The Restoration Of The Art Of Listening

A quick word of warning: this is a work of entertainment, filled with hyperbole, and is not intended to be taken in complete seriousness. With that in mind, enjoy!

Tempus tacendi, et tempus loquendi.

It has long been an Observation of mine that our World is little occupied with the Practice of Listening, and upon much Reflection, I have decided that there is a Moral Obligation for myself to expound on this most pressing Problem. In each Place, each Mode of Discourse, each Matter of Importance, I cannot help but be made aware of the Clamour created by a Miriad of Voices, each Shouting in a vain attempt to be heard above the Din of Others; not One realizing that their own Voice is simply Another Part of the Cacophony. Sirs, we seem to have lost the Art of Listening, and whereupon, our Manners and all things which proscribe to our very Humanity. As each Voice, each Opinion, each Insight piles ever higher upon the very Heap of Garbage that is swiftly accumulating within the Great Sphere of Literature, its Wretched Reak begins to overpower and obscure the Heart and Centre of this Great Tradition which has so unfortunately inspired the Multitude of Individual Response. With all my Heart, I urge and implore Each and Every One of Us to Refrain from all but the most Pure and Innocently Inspired Impulse to discover whether our own Humble Scribblings belong alongside those of our Betters. After all, it is only as a Society which can run as a well-oiled Machine, each Citizen accepting his Role and the Machine accepting each Citizen, that we can ever realize our Pretensions of being worthy of the Name: Human.

Comments

  1. My sense is that this piece should be read in the context of the phenomena you examined in your post entitled "Why do we write?" where more visitors to TOT's site go to the submission guidelines page than to the current issue page.

    To translate (and degrade a little) your eloquence, then, in the hope of perfect clarity: writers need to start reading; we need to stop just "yelling" our words indiscriminately and trying to reel in publication after publication. Street cred only gets you so far. My advice, to build on the general thrust of this timely plea, is to return to a time when literary style and attention were privileged over the capitalist mindset of "MORE MORE MORE"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Three Guidelines

In an attempt to begin articulating what effective writing looks like at the present moment, Teilo and I have formulated three basic guidelines. They're meant to start a conversation more than anything, and are not meant to be overly prescriptive. However, we feel that following them as closely as possible will eliminate many of the weaknesses we have observed in the writing submitted to our respective literary magazines. In no particular order, they are: - Subjectivity, as far as it illuminates common experience, can be more effective than objectivity. - Intertextuality can be an addition, but never the crux. - The form of a work of art should never become its content. Please feel free to comment. Both affirmation and disagreement are necessary cogs in the engine of any progression.

Manuscript Issue

It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati...

145 Years After Arnold

‎"More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete; and most of what now passes with us for religion and philosophy will be replaced by poetry." - Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold published his essay "The Study of Poetry," back in 1865. It seems that 145 years later, some things have changed similarly to this prediction, while others remain the same. Physics in particular seems to have discovered an afinity with poetry that could only have been imagined by Arnold. Some of the brightest physicists in the world can only fall back upon metaphor and allegory to explain their findings and research. The idea that science must rely as much upon preception as anything else has started to remove some of its aloofness from the arts, although it is still slow going. Poetry as an art may be fading into the background in society, but its methods of expressing...