Skip to main content

Return of the Litery Magazine

I'd simply like to direct your attention to an excellent article in the Guardian.

Enjoy!

Comments

  1. I don't want to say I told you so, but: I told you so! By "you," of course, I mean those who still endorse the lingering perception that online literary magazines are of a lower pedigree than print magazines, regardless of content and track record. There are a number of pros and cons with both mediums, and I think calls for the end of print culture and premature and hyperbolic, but this article indicates that some of the more substantial pros of online literary magazines are finally starting to catch on with the general public. Online literary magazines were in existence long before The Writers Block and The Oral Tradition, of course, but I still think that the burgeoning community of writers, artists, and editors who have known about the strength and potential for online literary venues for years and years should be entitled to a pat on the back and at least one "I told you so" to those for whom this article is news. Thanks for posting!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Manuscript Issue

It's been awhile since my last post, but now that it's summer I've been reinvigorated to come back to the magazine and the blog. To shake the dust off, I want to give a brief glimpse into the direction The Writers Block is headed: The next issue is going to be a tribute to and exploration of the relationship between handwriting and poetic composition. Until July 1st, the Block is accepting submissions for a poetry-only manuscript issue of handwritten and/or hand-illustrated poems in digitized, scanned, or photographed formats. I'm interested to see what sort of submissions will come in. I've tried to phrase the call specifically enough to communicate clearly what I'm looking for, while leaving it ambiguous enough to ensure a plurality of submissions. The inspiration for the call came out of my research on e-books, and how emerging literary technologies are changing the way we read and experience older printed and hand-written texts. Both print and digitizati...

Three Guidelines

In an attempt to begin articulating what effective writing looks like at the present moment, Teilo and I have formulated three basic guidelines. They're meant to start a conversation more than anything, and are not meant to be overly prescriptive. However, we feel that following them as closely as possible will eliminate many of the weaknesses we have observed in the writing submitted to our respective literary magazines. In no particular order, they are: - Subjectivity, as far as it illuminates common experience, can be more effective than objectivity. - Intertextuality can be an addition, but never the crux. - The form of a work of art should never become its content. Please feel free to comment. Both affirmation and disagreement are necessary cogs in the engine of any progression.

145 Years After Arnold

‎"More and more mankind will discover that we have to turn to poetry to interpret life for us, to console us, to sustain us. Without poetry, our science will appear incomplete; and most of what now passes with us for religion and philosophy will be replaced by poetry." - Matthew Arnold Matthew Arnold published his essay "The Study of Poetry," back in 1865. It seems that 145 years later, some things have changed similarly to this prediction, while others remain the same. Physics in particular seems to have discovered an afinity with poetry that could only have been imagined by Arnold. Some of the brightest physicists in the world can only fall back upon metaphor and allegory to explain their findings and research. The idea that science must rely as much upon preception as anything else has started to remove some of its aloofness from the arts, although it is still slow going. Poetry as an art may be fading into the background in society, but its methods of expressing...